Axenfeld Nerve Loop
Axenfeld Nerve Loop[edit | edit source]
Overview[edit | edit source]
- Intrascleral nerve loops were first described by Axenfeld in 19021. They are a common, incidental finding on slit lamp examination. It is important to recognize this entity as they may be mistaken for intrascleral foreign bodies.
Detailed Description[edit | edit source]
The term “Axenfeld Nerve Loop” is used to describe intrascleral nerve loops of the long, posterior, ciliary nerves. The ciliary nerve pierces the sclera near the optic nerve and travels within the sclera and suprachoroidal space until it branches at the level of the ciliary body1. The nerve loop is an anastomosis of the long ciliary nerve that turns to enter the sclera before turning back again to continue to the ciliary body3. The examiner may illicit pain if the loop or overlying conjunctiva are manipulated – as is common when probing for traumatic injury. The loop commonly appears as a grey, white nodule under the bulbar conjunctiva. It may be surrounded by pigment, especially in those with a darker iris. They are typically found a constant distance from the corneoscleral junction, usually within 3-4 mm of the limbus.
Epidemiology/Risk Factors[edit | edit source]
Histopathology[edit | edit source]
- Pathologic examination would reveal findings consistent with a peripheral nerve.
Differential Diagnosis[edit | edit source]
- Malignant Melanoma
- Scleral Foreign Bodies
Management/Treatment[edit | edit source]
- No therapy is needed – this is a natural, anatomic landmark. Several cases have been reported of anterior nerve sheath tumors arising from intrascleral nerve loops2.
Prognosis[edit | edit source]
- Very good.
References[edit | edit source]
1. Axenfeld UMT: Ueber intrasklerale. Nevenschleifen. Ber Dtsch Ophthalmol. Ges 30: 134-137, 1902.
2. Chang, Glasgow. Evidence that Anterior Eiscleral Nerve Sheath Tumors Arise From the Axenfeld Nerve Loop. Archives of Ophthalmology 127 (8): 1060. August 2009.
3. Reese AB. Intrascleral nerve loops. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1931; 29: 148-153.