Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)
Assigned status Up to Date on April 30, 2015.
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a relatively new refractive procedure designed to treat a multitude of refractive errors such as myopia, hyperopia, presbyopia, and astigmatism. The procedure involves using a femtosecond laser to create a corneal lenticule which is extracted whole through a small incision without the use of an excimer laser. It is reported to achieve effects similar to laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with excellent post-operative outcomes.
Starting in 2007, an intrastromal lenticule method was reintroduced as an alternative to LASIK called Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction (FLEx) intended for patients with extreme myopia. After improvements to scan modes and energy parameters, improved visual recovery times were noted, with refractive results similar to LASIK. Following the implementation of FLEx, a procedure called small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) was developed, involving a small 2-3 mm incision used to allow for extraction of the whole corneal lenticule without the need to create a flap.
While still in its early stages of proclivity amongst surgeons, SMILE is noted for achieving similar effects as LASIK but with some possible benefits such as faster recovery of post-op dry eye, reinnervation of corneal nerves, and a potential biomechanical advantage. The commencement of this procedure began in September 2011 and is established in various locations such as Europe, China and India. The clinical trial in the USA began in June 2012 and has been expanded by the US FDA after initial signs of success in a small sample of patients. To date, 255 patients have been treated at five centers in the USA. Outside of the USA, there are 150 centers in a total of 38 countries that perform the procedure.
Surgical Technique & History of Procedure
During the SMILE procedure, the patient is raised to the contact glass of the femtosecond laser and suction ports are activated to keep the patient's eye fixated in the correct position while the lenticule is created. The lower interface of the intrastromal lenticule is created first (using an out-to-in direction with the laser to maximize the time without blurring the patient’s central vision), followed by the upper interface of the lenticule (using an in-to-out direction), known as the cap, and finally a 2–3 mm tunnel incision (usually supero-temporal) that links the cap interface to the corneal surface. To avoid any undesirable effects in the cornea such as haziness, the two interfaces (lower and upper) are created from the endothelial side of the cornea to the epithelial side. The patient is then moved to the surgical microscope for the lenticule separation and extraction part of the procedure. The layers of the lenticule are outlined and the lenticule is removed from the cornea using a pair of retinal micro-forceps, or can be extracted directly from within the pocket with the latest versions of the lenticule stripper, one of many instruments being developed for the SMILE procedure specifically.
When planning the treatment, the following parameters can be selected by the surgeon: cap thickness, cap diameter, cap sidecut angle, refractive correction, lenticule diameter (optical zone), lenticule sidecut angle, and the minimum lenticule thickness (so that the lower lenticule interface can be easily differentiated from the upper interface).
The efficacy and safety of SMILE at the time of its introduction had yet to be established, but studies have since elaborated on these aspects. In a group consisting of 88 eyes, Ang et al. (2014) found that 95.5% of the eyes were within ±1.00 D of the attempted correction and 78.4% were within ±0.50 D of the attempted correction. Additionally it was found that uncorrected visual distance acuity (UDVA) of 20/40 or better was seen in 100% of eyes at 3 month post-op and 76.5% were 20/20 or better, up to 12 months post-op. Continuing, it was determined that there was no significant difference between the efficacy, predictability, or safety between low myopia eyes and eyes of -5.00 D or greater, highlighting the large span of cases that this procedure has the potential to improve. Because the incision is so minimal, the possibility of another treatment after SMILE is possible due to the cornea being left mostly intact. Another possibility being examined is the use of the lenticule for re-implantation after being cryopreserved, which has been successfully performed in rabbits.
Complications arising during the SMILE procedure have been reported very infrequently, supporting the reported safety and predictability of the procedure. Studies using SMILE found epithelial abrasions, small tears at the incision, and perforated caps in few cases, however, none of these patients had late visual symptoms. The loss of suction during the femtosecond laser portion of the procedure is one of the primary complications with SMILE, and seems to be a difficult topic to define care that applies to most or all cases. While noted to be very infrequent, one study showed the majority of cases in which suction loss occurred were able to be reapplied in the same setting(81.8%). 
The rest of the suction loss cases were aborted, though, it should be noted that for all cases involving suction-loss, there remained a significant number of patients that attained UDVA within attempted correction. Because a small incision (2-3 mm) is used in place of an entire flap, corneal nerve severance is minimal in comparison to LASIK. This coincides with the decreased occurrence of post-operative dry eye and studies have indeed shown an increase in nerve reinnervation after treatment. In a study by Xu et al. comparing dry eye parameters between SMILE and LASIK, all paramaters were found to be worse in the early postoperative period for both groups, however the SMILE group showed better scores in tear break up time, the McMonnies score, and Schirmer’s test. These findings by Xu et al. coincide with similar results from a study by Denoyer et al. which found high rates of dry eye symptoms for both procedures reported one month after surgery, but at 6 months after surgery, 80% of SMILE patients finished using any eye drops in contrast to only 57% of the patients in the LASIK group who did the same.
The SMILE procedure, while still in its early stages, seems to be a promising alternative to LASIK in some cases. Given its flapless technique and results that appear to be similar to LASIK, it may offer the same correctional abilities with the potential benefits of faster recovery of post-op dry eye, quicker reinnervation of corneal nerves, and biomechanical advantages. After clinical trials are completed for SMILE and pending its approval, this procedure may be an upcoming option for some patients, due to its minimally invasive technique and promising outcomes.
- Reinstein et al.: Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes. Eye and Vision 2014 1:3. Web 10 Mar. 2015. http://www.eandv.org/content/pdf/s40662-014-0003-1.pdf
- "Innovative SMILE Procedure from ZEISS Successfully Performed on More than 80,000 Eyes." Innovative SMILE Procedure from ZEISS. ZEISS, 04 Feb. 2014. Web. 10 Mar. 2015. http://www.zeiss.com/content/dam/Meditec/downloads/pdf/press-releases/czm_pi_smile_80000_procedures_20140204_en.pdf
- Liu Y-C, Pujara T, Mehta JS (2014) New Instruments for Lenticule Extraction in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). PLoS ONE 9(12): e113774. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113774
- Ang et al. : Refractive lenticule extraction: Transition and comparison of 3 surgical techniques Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery , Volume 40 , Issue 9 , 1415 – 1424
- Denoyer et al. : Dry Eye Disease after Refractive Surgery: Comparative Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extractionnversus LASIK, Ophthalmology, Available online 22 November 2014, ISSN 0161-6420,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.004. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016164201400952X)
- Ganesh et al. : Cryopreservation of extracted corneal lenticules after small incision lenticule extraction for potential use in human subjects. Cornea. 2014 Dec ;33(12):1355-62. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000276.
- Vestergaard et al. : 'Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction' Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol 40, no.3, pp. 403–411., 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.053
- Wong, Chee Wai et al. : Incidence and management of suction loss in refractive lenticule extraction. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery , Volume 40 , Issue 12 , 2002 – 2010
- Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S: Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011, 37:127–137.
- Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M: Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 2011, 95:335–339.
- Vestergaard A, Ivarsen AR, Asp S, Hjortdal JO: Small-incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia: predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012, 38:2003–2010.
- Hjortdal JO, Vestergaard AH, Ivarsen A, Ragunathan S, Asp S: Predictors for the outcome of small-incision lenticule extraction for Myopia. J Refract Surg 2012, 28:865–871.
- Wang Y, Bao XL, Tang X, Zuo T, Geng WL, Jin Y: Clinical study of femtosecond laser corneal small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2013, 49:292–298.
- Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kobashi H: Visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2014, 157:128–134. e122.
- Sekundo W, Gertnere J, Bertelmann T,Solomatin I: One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014, 252(5):837-843.
- Agca A, Demirok A, Cankaya KI, Yasa D, Demircan A, Yildirim Y, Ozkaya A, Yilmaz OF: Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2014, 37(4):292-296.
- Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y: Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg 2014, 30:248–254.
- Xu Y, Yang Y: Dry eye after small incision lenticule extraction and LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg 2014, 30:186–190.