Megalopapilla

From EyeWiki

All content on Eyewiki is protected by copyright law and the Terms of Service. This content may not be reproduced, copied, or put into any artificial intelligence program, including large language and generative AI models, without permission from the Academy.


Megalopapilla (MP) is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by an enlarged nerve head and abnormal disc shape. It is typically a benign condition but must be differentiated from other diseases of the optic nerve that can cause vision loss such as glaucoma.

Disease Entity

Megalopapillae

Disease

Megalopapilla (MP) is a rare, congenital, non-progressive anomaly characterized by an enlarged optic nerve head (>2.5mm)[1] with or without an abnormal disc shape and can occur in one or both eyes. MP can mimic glaucomatous changes of the optic nerve, with an increase cup area, volume, and shape however the optic nerve has a normal rim area and volume. Megalopapilae is a diagnosis of exclusion, therefore no structural abnormalities consistent with an alternative diagnosis can be present. It is commonly divided into 2 phenotypes:[2][3][4]

Type 1: Normal configuration with enlarged disc, high C/D ratio, disc surface and/or neuroretinal rim pallor.

Type 2: An upwardly displaced cup that obliterates the neuroretinal rim, typically unilateral and with higher frequency of cilioretinal arteries.[2]

MP is a benign condition with unknown etiology, but it has been reported in individuals with congenital glaucoma, basal encephalocele, and pulverulent cataract.[5][6]

Patients are typically asymptomatic, but MP can cause a physiologically enlarged blind spot in some individuals and rarely reported reduced visual acuity.[2] While this entity may resemble glaucomatous neuropathy on fundoscopy, MP has no optic nerve fiber loss or retinal nerve fiber layer thinning.[7] Therefore, MP is a pseudoglaucomatous condition and possibly a variant of normal, representing an extreme example of physiologic cupping.

Etiology

The mechanism behind MP has not been elucidated and it may be a normal developmental variation during embryogenesis resulting in an increased number of optic nerve fibers.[8] Another proposed mechanism is altered optic axonal migration in early embryogenesis in children with basal encephalocele.[6] MP has been reported in a set of twins and their paternal grandfather, suggesting a possible hereditary component.[9]

Risk Factors

There is no known epidemiological association or risk factors. However, a study of a genetically isolated Marshallese population found 22 out of 54 eyes to have an optic disc >2.10 mm and 36 patients with a cup to disc ratio of >0.6. [10]

History

Typically, megalopapilla is an incidental finding on clinical exam without pathology. A thorough review of ocular history, past medical history and family history should be performed to rule out other causes of an anomalous appearing optic disc, such as glaucoma or high myopia-associated large optic disc.[11]

Physical Examination

Megalopapilla should not cause visual impairment and the intraocular pressure should be in the normal range.[2] Fundoscopy typically reveals an enlarged disc, high C/D ratio, disc surface and/or neuroretinal rim pallor, displaced cup with or without obliteration of the neuroretinal rim.[2] [4] [7][1][8] These findings make it extremely difficult to distinguish MP from a glaucomatous optic nerve.

Diagnostic Procedures

Heidelberg retinal tomography (HRT) is an excellent tool for differentiating megalopapilla from pathological causes of an anomalous optic nerve.[2][12] Unlike glaucoma, MP eyes have preserved optic disc area, rim area, and rim volume demonstrated on HRT.[2] [4] [8] [12] One study of 50 MP eyes and 80 normals eyes show rim area (mm2) of 1.96 ±0.36 in the megalopapilla group and 1.90 ± 0.22 in the normal group (p= 0.25) and rim volume (mm3) of 0.15 ± 0.07 in the megalopapilla group and 0.14 ± 0.07 in the normal group (p= 0.48).[8]

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the peripapillary retinal fiber layer (pRNFL) is another tool that can assist in differentiating glaucoma from MP. OCT studies show normal to increased thickness of the pRNFL in individuals with MP compared to normal.[7] [8] [13] In one study of 50 MP eyes and 80 normal eyes in children, the average RNFL thickness(µm) is 117.34 ±11.88 (MP) versus 106.83 ± 13.48 (normal) (p <0.01; CI:-15.85 to -5.18).[8] In children, the increased RNFL thickness is attributed to larger discs having more ganglion cells. .[7] [8] [13]

Visual field testing may show an enlarged physiologic blind spot in some patients. However, MP patients typically do not present with peripheral field loss.[2]

Differential diagnosis

  • Glaucoma (Congenital; JOAG; POAG; secondary glaucomas)
    • Physicians should also be aware of the shared similarities between MP and glaucoma: increased cup area, cup volume, and cup shape.
  • Morning glory syndrome
  • Optic nerve coloboma
  • Staphyloma
  • Optic nerve glioma
  • Tilted disc syndrome
  • Myopia

Management

The anomalous optic nerve may provide a diagnostic challenge for other diseases that may affect the optic nerve such as chronic open angle glaucoma. Routine visual fields and OCT pRNFL could be considered in addition to the routine eye exam to establish baseline measurements for potential future disease monitoring. However, there is no evidence that patients with MP are at increased risk for other eye conditions.

Prognosis

There should be no progression of MP or visual changes beyond the natural loss of ganglion cells and rim area associated with normal aging.[4] A study comparing 39 children with MP to 39 adults with MP found children with MP to have significantly larger optic rim area and smaller cup compared to adults with MP who had a similar disc size. These findings suggest that enlargement of the cup of the optic disk and reduction of the rim area can occur through life.[4]

Additional Resources

  1. 1.0 1.1 Franceschetti A, Bock RH. Megalopapilla: A New Congenital Anomaly. Am J Ophthalmol. 1950;(2):227-235.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Optic Nerve. The Glaucomas. Published online November 27, 2009:193-287. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69146-4_17
  3. Randhawa S, Shah VA, Kardon RH. Megalopapilla, Not Glaucoma. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2007;125(8):1134-1134. doi:10.1001/ARCHOPHT.125.8.1134
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Gama R, Relha C, Gaspar S, Esteves C, Nascimento F. Differences of megalopapilla and normal sized disk with age-an optical coherence tomography analysis. J AAPOS. 2020 Feb;24(1):14.e1-14.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.09.019. Epub 2020 Jan 8. PMID: 31926369.
  5. Collier M. [Megalopapilla and central pulverulent cataract]. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr. 1965;65(9):719-724.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Goldhammer Y, Smith JL. Optic nerve anomalies in basal encephalocele. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93(2):115-118. doi:10.1001/archopht.1975.01010020121004
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Costa AMC, Cronemberger S. Optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness descriptive analysis in megalopapilla. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(6):368-371. doi:10.1097/IJG.0B013E318279B3AF
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 Lee HS eok, Park SW oo, Heo H. Megalopapilla in children: a spectral domain optical coherence tomography analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(4):e301-e305. doi:10.1111/AOS.12545
  9. Sharma S, Singh K, Kaur PP. Case series: Megalopapillae in twins - Congenital or hereditary? Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(7):2610-2611. doi:10.4103/IJO.IJO_2480_21
  10. Maisel JM, Pearlstein CS, Adams WH, Heotis PM. Large optic disks in the Marshallese population. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107(2):145-150. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(89)90213-4
  11. Jonas JB, Jonas RA, Panda-Jonas S. Clinical and histological aspects of the anatomy of myopia, myopic macular degeneration and myopia-associated optic neuropathy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2025 Sep 20;109:101402. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2025.101402. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40983254.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Sampaolesi J, Sampaolesi R. The pseudoglaucomas. International Ophthalmology 2001 23:4. 2001;23(4):267-269. doi:10.1023/A:1014465522326
  13. 13.0 13.1 Gama R, Santos JC, Costa RS, da Costa DC, Eirô N. Optical coherence tomography analysis of the inner retinal layers in children. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53(6):614-620. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.02.025
The Academy uses cookies to analyze performance and provide relevant personalized content to users of our website.