Fundus Autofluorescence

From EyeWiki

All content on Eyewiki is protected by copyright law and the Terms of Service. This content may not be reproduced, copied, or put into any artificial intelligence program, including large language and generative AI models, without permission from the Academy.


Overview

Blue light short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence image (Spectralis) of normal right fundus demonstrating normal foveal hypo-AF. The temporal hypo-AF (arrow) represents artifact from vitreous opacity.

Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) is a non-invasive imaging modality that has become increasingly popular in both research and clinical settings due to its ability to map naturally and pathologically occurring fluorophores in the posterior pole. Fundus autofluorescence imaging originated from early observations during fluorescein angiography, when intrinsic fluorescence of the ocular fundus was initially recognized but often misinterpreted as pseudofluorescence. In 1970, Machemer and colleagues demonstrated that pseudofluorescence resulted from reflected light emitted by fluorescein within intraocular fluids rather than true tissue fluorescence, establishing critical principles for distinguishing optical artifacts from intrinsic retinal signals.[1] Subsequent histologic and biochemical studies identified lipofuscin, a fluorophore derived from photoreceptor outer segment metabolism, as an age-dependent pigment accumulating within retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells and capable of emitting autofluorescence. This understanding led to the first quantitative in vivo measurements by Kitagawa and colleagues in 1989, who demonstrated a significant increase in macular autofluorescence with age, providing direct evidence of progressive lipofuscin accumulation in the living human retina[2]

Further advances were achieved in 1995 when Delori and colleagues characterized the excitation and emission spectra of fundus autofluorescence and confirmed that lipofuscin within the RPE is the dominant fluorophore responsible for this signal.[3] The introduction of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy enabled high-resolution topographic imaging of autofluorescence, allowing precise visualization of lipofuscin distribution and facilitating clinical application. Fundus autofluorescence imaging has since become an essential noninvasive tool for evaluating retinal aging, diagnosing inherited and degenerative retinal diseases, and monitoring disease progression, particularly in conditions involving RPE dysfunction such as age-related macular degeneration and inherited retinal dystrophies.[4] Together, these developments transformed autofluorescence from an optical observation into a fundamental modality for investigating retinal physiology and pathology.

Unlike fluorescein angiography, FAF does not require the injection of a fluorescein dye in order to image the retina, but rather utilizes the fluorescent properties of lipofuscin within the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) to create an image. Lipofuscin, a byproduct of lysosomal breakdown of photoreceptor outer segments, is composed of numerous bisretinoids including A2E, A2PE, isoA2E, and A2-DHP-PE. When subjected to a light source, these bisretinoids absorb blue light with a peak excitation wavelength of 470nm and emit yellow-green light with a peak wavelength of 600nm, depending on the chemical makeup of the lipofuscin. A detector is then used to record the emission signals and create an image that acts as a density map of lipofuscin, with brighter areas representing regions of increased lipofuscin density. Since many retinal pathologies often lead to RPE dysfunction and an accumulation of lipofuscin, abnormal patterns of autofluorescence (AF) on FAF imaging can act as markers for retinal disease.

Normal Fundus Autofluorescence

In a normal fundus without retinal pathology, blood vessels will appear dark since blood is able to strongly absorb the blue (~488nm) or green (~514nm) light that is typically used in FAF imaging. Depending on the device being used, the optic nerve will usually appear dark due to the absence of RPE or lipofuscin in this region. With blue or green short-wavelength FAF, the fovea will usually be visualized as a spot of hypo-AF due to the high concentration of light-absorbing xanthophyll pigment in this area.

Abnormal Fundus Autofluorescence

Green light short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence image (Optos) of a patient with retinitis pigmentosa, demonstrating an abnormal perimacular ring of hyper-AF (arrow) and diffuse, patchy hypo-AF in the mid-periphery (arrowhead).

Abnormal fundus autofluorescence is any pattern of AF that deviates from the classic appearance of a normal fundus as previously described.

Abnormal regions of hyper-autofluoresence (AF) are a result of increased levels of lipofuscin/compounds with similar autofluorescent spectra, or increased transmission of fluorescence. Some notable causes of hyper-AF include:

  • Increased RPE lipofuscin secondary to RPE dysfunction
  • Presence of subretinal autofluorescent material (eg. vitelliform lesions, blood breakdown products, certain types of drusen, subretinal fluid in central serous chorioretinopathy)
  • Optic disc drusen
  • Loss of macular photopigment and photoreceptor attenuation


Abnormal regions of hypo-autofluorescence (AF) are a result of decreased levels of lipofuscin, decreased RPE density, or blockage of fluorescence. Some notable causes of hypo-AF include:


Uses

FAF has become a particularly useful non-invasive imaging technique in the diagnosis and management of retinal dystrophies. There is no need of any dye since lipofuscin is found endogenously within the retinal cell. Using FAF alone, a neural network was able to discern eyes with Stargardt disease, Best disease and retinitis pigmentosa from healthy eyes with an accuracy of 95%.[5] In retinitis pigmentosa, FAF can sometimes demonstrate a hyper-AF ring that constricts over time, acting as a marker of disease progression.[6] Currently FAF has clinical applications in a variety of retinal diseases, including but not limited to:

Progression of dry age-related macular degeneration on blue light short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (Spectralis). (A) Left fundus of a patient with geographic atrophy showing hypo-AF patches representing areas of geographic atrophy surrounded by hyper-AF representing areas with sick retinal pigment epithelium. (B) Progression of geographic atrophy represented by expanding areas of hypo-AF.


The clinical applications of FAF continue to expand as a result of ongoing research. For example, in patients with diabetic retinopathy FAF has been shown to demonstrate significant alterations that could not be observed on color imaging, suggesting that FAF may be useful in the detection of early changes associated with progression of retinopathy.[7] Furthermore, in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration, patterns of FAF have been shown to predict anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy success.[8] FAF can show a characteristic pattern of granular high density fluorescence with low density fluorescence spots in females that may be carriers of choroidemia, a X-linked degenerative retinal disorder. Ultimately, this promising research suggests that the clinical utility of FAF imaging will continue to broaden into the future.

Limitations

Unlike fluorescein angiography, FAF imaging does not require administration of intravenous fluorescein dye and therefore avoids possible complications such as pain, redness, nausea, vomiting, or pruritis. However, FAF does have several limitations. For instance, FAF has a signal strength that is approximately two orders of magnitude less than the signal seen in fluorescein angiography.[9] In addition, FAF imaging is susceptible to artifact from media opacities in the anterior segment or vitreous, making the interpretation of images in some patients difficult. Furthermore, given the variability in external lighting conditions, device settings, and type of device used to capture FAF images, comparing imaging findings between patients or in a single patient over time can be challenging. While quantitative fundus autofluorescence imaging devices have been used in research applications to help address this issue, this technology has yet to be widely implemented in the clinical setting.

Fundus AF imaging uses short-wavelength excitation light in the blue range thus limits the clear visualization of the central retina due to absorption of blue light by macular pigment which leads to limited visualization of the central retina due to absorption of the blue excitation light by macular pigment. Autofluorescence using red light excitation is an upcoming novel modality to improve visualization of fovea and parafoveal area since red light is not absorbed by macular pigment. [10] Red-AF images shows improved quality images with greater patient comfort, with limited effect of cataract on image quality, and safer technology since most of the ocular tissue including the lens do not absorb >600 nm wavelengths; the red-AF SLO uses 642 and 705 nm excitation wavelengths.

Additional Resources

Pole C, Ameri H. Fundus Autofluorescence and Clinical Applications. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2021;16:432–461.

References

  1. Machemer R, Norton EWD, Gass JDM, Choromokos E. Pseudofluorescence—a problem in interpretation of fluorescein angiograms. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970;70(1):1-10.
  2. Kitagawa K, Nishida S, Ogura Y. In vivo quantitation of autofluorescence in human retinal pigment epithelium. Ophthalmologica. 1989;199(2-3):116-121.
  3. Delori FC, Dorey CK, Staurenghi G, Arend O, Goger DG, Writer JJ. In vivo fluorescence of the ocular fundus exhibits retinal pigment epithelium lipofuscin characteristics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36(3):718-729.
  4. Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Holz FG, Bird AC, Spaide RF. Fundus autofluorescence imaging: review and perspectives. Retina. 2008;28(3):385-409.
  5. Miere A, Le Meur T, Bitton K, Pallone C, Semoun O, Capuano V, et al. Deep learning-based classification of inherited retinal diseases using fundus autofluorescence. J Clin Med. 2020; 9:3303.
  6. Lima LH, Burke T, Greenstein VC, et al. Progressive constriction of the hyperautofluorescent ring in retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(4):718-727.
  7. Calvo-Maroto AM, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Madrid-Costa D, Cerviño A. Pilot study on visual function and fundus autofluorescence assessment in diabetic patients. J Ophthalmol. 2016; 2016:1287847.
  8. Heimes B, Lommatzsch A, Zeimer M, Gutfleisch M, Spital G, Bird AC, et al. Foveal RPE autofluorescence as a prognostic factor for anti-VEGF therapy in exudative AMD. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 246:1229.
  9. Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Holz FG, Bird AC, Spaide RF. Fundus autofluorescence imaging: review and perspectives. Retina. 2008; 28(3):385–409.
  10. Birtel J, Bauer T, Pauleikhoff L, Rüber T, Gliem M, Charbel Issa P. Fundus autofluorescence imaging using red excitation light. Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 19;13(1):9916. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36217-x. PMID: 37336979; PMCID: PMC10279676.
The Academy uses cookies to analyze performance and provide relevant personalized content to users of our website.